Bailing out Corporate America - Reflective Paper Research

Bailing out Corporate America - Reflective - Research Paper Example Sound familiar, as you can see, it was written in 1991. This very same scenario can be seen in new articles from 1943, 1980, 1991, and now 2008. The American people say that they do not want to reward greed by bailing out the corporations but greed is not the real problem. The real problem is that it fails the American dream. How might we define the American dream? It is more than cars and money. James Adams was the first to actually attempt to define it. That definition was of â€Å"a land in which life could be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.† This is a dream that European upper classes might have some difficulty in interpreting and now many of our own are having trouble hanging on to. Americans have become weary and mistrustful of it. It is a dream about a social order in which each man and woman shall attain their fullest potential of which they are innately capable of being recognized by others for what they are regardless of the circumstances from which they came. This is the dream that is being lost to Americans who are working hard and losing to companies who are not. From the time we are young children, we are taught, if we work hard and do well, we will be rewarded. Essential to the American dream is the belief that you will be rewarded if you are successful. This is so much a part of the society and culture that it also becomes part of the ethics of the culture. If you work hard throughout your life, you will have what you want and maybe more. This is where the anger really comes from. Greed is part of the American dream. All Americans are greedy. Americans do not hope to have just enough, they hope to have everything they can get but they expect to get it by working hard, doing a good job, and being successful (Sandel, 2009) anything else is considered theft. Why then, are we rewarding with millions of dollars those companies

The Foreign Policy In The USSR During And After The Cold War Essay

The Foreign Policy In The USSR During And After The Cold War - Essay Example As the animosity between the Communist Soviet Union and the Capitalist United States spread to various countries all over the world, the eventual result was that both Asia and Europe were divided with almost all countries on the two continents being granted the option of willingly pledging their alliance with either of the two powers or being forced into accepting an alliance. Hitler’s suicide and the subsequent end of the World War II was seen to be a crucial catalyst in the ushering in of a new era marked by widespread decolonization as well as the liberation of most of the countries that had previously been enslaved (McCannon, 2010). These newly liberalized countries were seen to be battling with numerous challenges including widespread territorial divisions as well as the problem of having bankrupt economies, this situation inadvertently leads to the countries experiencing a large-scale exodus of refugees. The Capitalistic and Communist Nations were quick to utilize this o pportunity and started to attempt to influence these newly liberated countries by offering them financial aid (Bulliet, 2009).  This move by the two opposing powers was seen to further fuel their ongoing rivalry. The Cold War was seen to be mainly characterized by numerous numbers of both international and domestic military coalitions, espionage developments, wide spread armament race, rampant political propaganda as well as particularly destructive technological developments.   Gradually, this Cold War saw the development of nuclear arms as well as a space race between the warring countries of the USSR and United States. It happened to be quite ironic that the newly liberated countries were being forced to essentially become part of a world that happened to now be polarized into two factions that forced these countries to essentially align themselves and support either one of the two superpower blocs. However, not all countries opted to join the two super power blocks with coun tries such as India and Yugoslavia opting to rally and form a